Nation Awaits

 

 

 

Search  Inquiry Net

Home ] Up ] Next ]

Nation Awaits
Glory & Shame
Danish Honor
Lullaby
Canoeist
Death Song
Zuni Sunset
Zon-zi-mon
Hither Thunder!
Muje Mukesin
Alouette
Omaha Tribal
Ah, Yi!
Deep Dark
Cuna Bird
Zuni Sunrise
Pussy Willow
Chippewa Cradle
Prayer Warriors
Ghost Dance
Omaha Call
Peace Pact
Zuni Council

Scout Books

Site Contents

by Ernest Thompson Seton

THE NATION AWAITS A SONG

In the last few years many thousands of attempts have been made to write a national song, and so far as known all have been utter failures.

A glance at the material submitted shows a wholly wrong conception of a national song; indeed a wrong idea of the whole subject of song.

Apparently none of the aspirants have recognized the wide t difference between a song and a poem; not one of them has recognized the difference between a poem and an anthem; not one of them has recognized the difference between a lyric and a marching song.

A poem is a more or less pleasing succession of statements, utilizing the beauties of language and ideas; it is designed to be spoken by one voice.

An anthem is a single poem (in responsive parts originally) set to music which must be slow enough to permit enunciation by many voices singing at once.

A lyric is a slight poem, a succession of sketchy ideas, tied together by a repetitive portion, set to music, to be sung by one voice.

A national song must consist of a succession of very brief, simple, inspiring statements, alternating with a succession of mere vocables--that is, modulated rhythmic shouting which begets and vents enthusiasm, but does not count for its effect on words or enunciated ideas. It should be in marching time, for that is the tune of heroic thought and action, and it must be suitable for a multitude of voices singing together. It may or may not be antiphonal or arranged in responses like the original anthem.

If these definitions are accepted and used as tests we shall find that all recent attempts at a national song have been poems of varying merit, but foredoomed to failure from their plan.

It is generally conceded that at present we have no truly national song; certainly none officially established.  We rise to the "flag song" but no one considers it satisfactory or permanent.  It is accepted till we get a better.  An examination of its parts shows that it fails in every essential but one and in that is overdone.   It is replete with heroic statement.  But it is not simple; it is not good rhythm; it is not suitable for singing; it is not a marching song; it does not offer a repeated phrase of swinging, stirring vocables in which all can join.

It is unfortunate in conception. Imagine beginning our national anthem by raising a question as to whether our flag is still flying or not.  We know perfectly well that it is flying, and is going to go right on a-flying.

I do not know anything to commend its rival "America" except the dignity of the music, which, however, is preempted by Great Britain.

One can select from a long list of national songs examples which have been kept alive by one or more of the essentials already listed, in spite of their lack of the other elements. The "Marseillaise," for instance, though superb in rhythm, ring and tramp, is far overburdened with statements, for which weakness however, the national genius has found a remedy by ignoring the statements, except the initial one of each section, turning the rest into mere trumpetesque vocables.

Very rarely do we hear more than the first two lines of the "Marseillaise." The genius of the people is greater than the genius of the man who wrote it.  The fact is that it is the French national air, but it is not truly their national song.

On the other hand, every song that has sprung spontaneously from the heart of the people responds in form to these rules, but not always, alas! in the elevation of its sentiment.  The nearest approaches in America to national song as here defined, are the negro spirituals and the college yells.

"Mary and Martha" or "Swing Low, Sweet Chariot," are good examples of perfect song form carried by ring and swing, by the appeal to the popular ear without any appeal to the higher instincts or emotions.

Shakespeare's songs are commonly correct, as for example, the page's song in "As You Like It."

It was a lover and his lass
With a hey and a ho, and a hey nonino
That o'er the green cornfields did pass
In springtime, the only pretty ring time,
When birds do sing, hey ding a ding, ding
Sweet lovers love the spring.

The second, fourth, fifth and sixth lines are the repetitive portions throughout.

The traditional songs of England, Ireland and Scotland, are usually correct, although they have been curiously hybridized by the ballad, which is simply rhythmic history and has little in common with the national song.

The traditional song "A frog he would a-wooing go," is an example of perfect form in the lyric.

If we take various popular patriotic songs that our country has produced we find only three that have in any measure established themselves in the hearts and voices of the people as national songs. They are "John Brown's Body," "Yankee Doodle," and "Dixie," all three born of the heroic spirit of the time, and all filling the definition perfectly, except that the slight statement prefacing each new explosion of vocables is unheroic; is indeed absurd, and a careful analysis shows that these are each and all of them national airs, not national songs.  If some of our poets would rewrite these in accord with the genius of patriotic song, we should probably have an accepted permanent national song.

And which of our poets is competent?  I hope I shall not be thought flippant if I claim that the man who can compose a successful college yell, is more likely than any other to be equipped for the problem and respond with the much desired expression of national spirit.  As a step toward the solution I suggest that one acceptable form might be this:

bulletBrief rhythmic statement suitable for one or maybe more voices.
bulletMere vocables, modulated rhythmic shouting for many voices, repeated at alternate intervals.

Such a structural unit rendered in simple martial strains, repeated twice or thrice, might fulfill all the conditions and supply us at once with a national air and a national song, one that will answer to this, the great test, that it so exactly voices the national feeling in time of exaltation, that it becomes the spontaneous expression of noble, patriotic emotion, and fixes itself so firmly in the minds of the people that it can live without print.

The Birch Bark Roll

 

 

   

 

 


Additional Information:

Peer- Level Topic Links:
[ Nation Awaits ] Glory & Shame ] Danish Honor ] Lullaby ] Canoeist ] Death Song ] Zuni Sunset ] Zon-zi-mon ] Hither Thunder! ] Muje Mukesin ] Alouette ] Omaha Tribal ] Ah, Yi! ] Deep Dark ] Cuna Bird ] Zuni Sunrise ] Pussy Willow ] Chippewa Cradle ] Prayer Warriors ] Ghost Dance ] Omaha Call ] Peace Pact ] Zuni Council ]

Parent- Level Topic Links:
Native Skills ] Totem Poles ] Indian Sign Language ] Indian Ceremonies ] Indian Dance ] Indian Songs ] Birch Bark Dances ] Birch Bark Songs ] Birch Bark Plays ] Indian Games for Boys ]

The Inquiry Net Main Topic Links:
 [Outdoor Skills]  [Patrol Method [Old-School]  [Adults [Advancement]  [Ideals]  [Leadership]  [Uniforms]

Search This Site:

Search Amazon.Com:

When you place an order with Amazon.Com using the search box below, a small referral fee is returned to The Inquiry Net to help defer the expense of keeping us online.  Thank you for your consideration!

Search:

Keywords:

Amazon Logo

 

 

Scout Books Trading Post

Dead Bugs, Blow Guns, Sharp Knives, & Snakes:
What More Could A Boy Want?

Old School Scouting:
What to Do, and How to Do It!

To Email me, replace "(at)" below with "@"
Rick(at)Kudu.Net

If you have questions about one of my 2,000 pages here, you must send me the "URL" of the page!
This "URL" is sometimes called the "Address" and it is usually found in a little box near the top of your screen.  Most URLs start with the letters "http://"

The Kudu Net is a backup "mirror" of The Inquiry Net.  

2003, 2011 The Inquiry Net, http://inquiry.net  In addition to any Copyright still held by the original authors, the Scans, Optical Character Recognition, extensive Editing,  and HTML Coding on this Website are the property of the Webmaster.   My work may be used by individuals for non-commercial, non-web-based activities, such as Scouting, research, teaching, and personal use so long as this copyright statement and a URL to my material is included in the text
The purpose of this Website is to provide access  to hard to find, out-of-print documents.  Much of the content has been edited to be of practical use in today's world and is not intended as historical preservation.   I will be happy to provide scans of specific short passages in the original documents for people involved in academic research.  

 

Last modified: October 15, 2016.